@modestagarrick2
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 2 weeks ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
End Teaching People to "Organize" When Your Company Has Absolutely No Clue What Genuinely Matters: How Task Management Training Fails in Dysfunctional Workplaces
Let me going to destroy one of the biggest popular misconceptions in workplace training: the assumption that teaching staff better "prioritization" methods will fix productivity challenges in companies that have no consistent priorities themselves.
After seventeen years of working with companies on productivity challenges, I can tell you that priority management training in a chaotic organization is like instructing someone to sort their possessions while their building is literally on fire around them.
This is the fundamental problem: most companies dealing with from time management crises don't have time management problems - they have leadership dysfunction.
Standard task planning training believes that workplaces have clear, stable goals that staff can learn to understand and work on. That belief is entirely divorced from reality in nearly all contemporary workplaces.
We worked with a significant advertising agency where staff were repeatedly complaining about being "failing to organize their work successfully." Management had poured hundreds of thousands on task management training for each staff.
The training included all the usual techniques: urgency-importance matrices, ABC classification approaches, calendar blocking techniques, and complex task tracking applications.
Yet efficiency remained to decline, worker overwhelm rates rose, and work completion results turned worse, not improved.
When I analyzed what was actually happening, I found the underlying problem: the organization at the leadership level had absolutely no clear priorities.
Let me share what the normal experience looked like for workers:
Monday: Top executives would declare that Client A was the "highest focus" and each employee should to focus on it right away
24 hours later: A separate senior leader would distribute an "urgent" message declaring that Client B was actually the "most critical" priority
Day three: A third division head would call an "urgent" conference to communicate that Client C was a "must-have" requirement that required to be delivered by immediately
Day four: The initial executive manager would voice anger that Project A was not progressed enough and insist to know why employees weren't "focusing on" it properly
Friday: Every three projects would be behind, several deadlines would be missed, and employees would be criticized for "inadequate priority management techniques"
Such cycle was happening constantly after week, regularly after month. No level of "time planning" training was going to enable staff manage this management chaos.
This core challenge wasn't that staff couldn't learn how to organize - it was that the company itself was entirely incapable of maintaining stable strategic focus for more than 24 hours at a time.
The team convinced management to eliminate their concentration on "individual priority planning" training and rather establish what I call "Organizational Focus Systems."
Instead of attempting to teach employees to organize within a constantly changing organization, we concentrated on building genuine company priorities:
Implemented a unified leadership leadership group with defined power for determining and enforcing company priorities
Created a systematic initiative review system that took place on schedule rather than constantly
Created clear standards for when projects could be modified and what level of sign-off was needed for such changes
Established mandatory communication systems to make certain that each focus modifications were communicated systematically and to everyone across all levels
Established buffer times where absolutely no priority changes were allowed without exceptional justification
The change was remarkable and outstanding:
Staff stress levels decreased dramatically as people at last were clear about what they were supposed to be focusing on
Output rose by over significantly within 45 days as staff could actually work on completing projects rather than constantly changing between conflicting priorities
Project completion times improved significantly as departments could coordinate and deliver work without constant interruptions and modifications
External satisfaction improved significantly as deliverables were consistently delivered as promised and to specification
That point: before you show employees to prioritize, make sure your leadership actually maintains stable direction that are suitable for prioritizing.
Here's another method that task planning training doesn't work in dysfunctional workplaces: by presupposing that staff have real control over their schedule and tasks.
I worked with a public sector department where workers were repeatedly being reprimanded for "poor task organization" and required to "productivity" training sessions.
This reality was that these workers had virtually absolutely no authority over their daily schedules. Let me describe what their normal schedule seemed like:
Roughly three-fifths of their schedule was taken up by mandatory sessions that they had no option to decline, regardless of whether these meetings were relevant to their core responsibilities
An additional one-fifth of their schedule was assigned to completing required reports and administrative tasks that added no usefulness to their primary work or to the clients they were supposed to serve
This leftover 20% of their schedule was expected to be dedicated for their real work - the tasks they were paid to do and that really made a difference to the organization
Additionally even this small amount of schedule was constantly interrupted by "immediate" demands, unexpected conferences, and administrative obligations that had no option to be rescheduled
Given these circumstances, absolutely no amount of "priority organization" training was going to help these workers get more effective. The issue wasn't their employee task planning skills - it was an organizational system that rendered meaningful work almost unattainable.
We worked with them implement systematic reforms to address the underlying obstacles to efficiency:
Got rid of unnecessary conferences and implemented specific criteria for when meetings were really necessary
Reduced paperwork requirements and eliminated redundant reporting requirements
Created dedicated time for core job activities that couldn't be invaded by non-essential demands
Developed defined procedures for evaluating what constituted a legitimate "immediate priority" versus normal requests that could be planned for scheduled times
Implemented workload sharing approaches to make certain that tasks was shared equitably and that not any individual was carrying excessive load with impossible workloads
Staff effectiveness increased dramatically, professional fulfillment increased considerably, and this department genuinely commenced offering higher quality outcomes to the public they were meant to support.
That important insight: organizations can't solve time management problems by showing employees to function more productively within broken organizations. You have to fix the systems initially.
At this point let's discuss perhaps the biggest absurd element of priority organization training in poorly-run companies: the idea that workers can mysteriously manage responsibilities when the company as a whole shifts its priorities numerous times per week.
I worked with a technology startup where the founder was well-known for having "game-changing" insights several times per week and requiring the whole company to right away pivot to pursue each new idea.
Employees would come at work on Monday with a clear knowledge of their objectives for the week, only to discover that the CEO had concluded overnight that all work they had been focusing on was suddenly not important and that they should to immediately begin concentrating on an initiative entirely different.
Such pattern would happen numerous times per month. Work that had been announced as "highest priority" would be dropped halfway through, departments would be constantly re-assigned to alternative work, and enormous portions of time and work would be wasted on initiatives that were never finished.
Their startup had poured significantly in "flexible task planning" training and advanced priority organization software to help employees "respond rapidly" to evolving priorities.
Yet no level of training or tools could solve the core problem: you can't efficiently organize perpetually changing directions. Perpetual change is the opposite of good organization.
The team worked with them create what I call "Strategic Direction Management":
Established regular priority review periods where major strategy changes could be evaluated and adopted
Developed strict requirements for what constituted a legitimate basis for changing set directions outside the planned assessment cycles
Created a "direction protection" period where zero modifications to set directions were allowed without emergency circumstances
Implemented defined communication procedures for when priority modifications were absolutely required, including complete consequence evaluations of what work would be interrupted
Established written sign-off from multiple stakeholders before each significant direction changes could be enacted
Their improvement was outstanding. After a quarter, measurable project success statistics increased by over 300%. Employee frustration instances fell considerably as employees could at last work on completing tasks rather than repeatedly beginning new ones.
Product development surprisingly improved because teams had adequate resources to thoroughly implement and refine their solutions rather than constantly moving to new projects before any project could be adequately finished.
This lesson: good prioritization needs priorities that keep consistent long enough for people to really focus on them and complete substantial results.
This is what I've discovered after decades in this business: time management training is only valuable in companies that already have their strategic act together.
When your workplace has clear strategic priorities, achievable demands, functional leadership, and processes that enable rather than prevent effective performance, then task planning training can be beneficial.
Yet if your company is marked by constant crisis management, conflicting directions, inadequate organization, unrealistic expectations, and reactive management approaches, then time planning training is more harmful than pointless - it's systematically harmful because it holds responsible employee choices for organizational dysfunction.
Quit squandering money on time management training until you've addressed your leadership priorities first.
Focus on creating workplaces with stable strategic focus, functional decision-making, and structures that actually enable meaningful work.
The workers would manage tasks extremely effectively once you offer them direction deserving of focusing on and an environment that genuinely facilitates them in doing their jobs. carrying excessive load with impossible demands
Employee productivity improved substantially, work happiness increased substantially, and their agency finally started delivering improved services to the public they were intended to support.
That key insight: organizations won't be able to fix time management challenges by teaching individuals to function more productively within chaotic organizations. Organizations have to repair the structures before anything else.
Now let's examine possibly the biggest laughable element of time management training in dysfunctional workplaces: the assumption that staff can magically organize tasks when the company itself changes its direction numerous times per month.
I consulted with a software startup where the founder was well-known for experiencing "game-changing" ideas multiple times per week and demanding the whole team to immediately shift to pursue each new priority.
Workers would show up at their jobs on any given day with a specific awareness of their priorities for the week, only to find that the management had decided over the weekend that all priorities they had been concentrating on was suddenly not relevant and that they should to immediately begin concentrating on something completely unrelated.
This pattern would happen several times per month. Initiatives that had been announced as "highest priority" would be forgotten mid-stream, departments would be repeatedly redirected to alternative work, and significant portions of time and energy would be wasted on work that were never finished.
This startup had poured heavily in "adaptive project organization" training and sophisticated task tracking systems to assist staff "adjust quickly" to evolving requirements.
But no degree of education or tools could solve the basic problem: you cannot successfully prioritize constantly evolving directions. Perpetual shifting is the enemy of good organization.
The team worked with them create what I call "Disciplined Objective Consistency":
Created regular planning assessment sessions where major priority adjustments could be considered and adopted
Established firm criteria for what represented a valid justification for modifying set priorities beyond the scheduled assessment sessions
Established a "objective protection" period where zero adjustments to established directions were acceptable without emergency approval
Created defined notification systems for when direction changes were really essential, with full consequence analyses of what work would be abandoned
Mandated documented approval from senior decision-makers before each substantial priority changes could be approved
This improvement was remarkable. After three months, actual project delivery rates improved by more than three times. Worker frustration instances fell substantially as employees could actually focus on completing tasks rather than repeatedly starting new ones.
Innovation surprisingly got better because teams had sufficient opportunity to completely implement and test their ideas rather than constantly moving to new directions before any project could be properly finished.
The lesson: successful organization needs objectives that keep unchanged long enough for people to really work on them and achieve substantial results.
Here's what I've concluded after extensive time in this business: task planning training is only useful in workplaces that genuinely have their strategic systems together.
If your company has consistent strategic direction, achievable demands, effective management, and processes that facilitate rather than hinder efficient activity, then time management training can be useful.
Yet if your organization is defined by continuous dysfunction, conflicting messages, poor planning, excessive workloads, and crisis-driven decision-making styles, then priority organization training is worse than pointless - it's systematically damaging because it holds responsible personal choices for systemic failures.
End throwing away resources on task organization training until you've fixed your leadership priorities first.
Start building workplaces with clear strategic priorities, effective decision-making, and systems that really support productive work.
The staff can organize perfectly effectively once you give them priorities suitable for prioritizing and an workplace that genuinely enables them in completing their responsibilities.
If you have any type of inquiries pertaining to where and how you can use Employment Training, you could contact us at our web-site.
Website: https://workplacesareeffective.bigcartel.com/product/skills-training-perth
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant