@candelaria88t
Profile
Registered: 2 months ago
How to Choose the Right Professional Development Course for Your Goals
Why Your Professional Development Budget Is Working Against You
Training budgets are getting cut left and right, yet somehow we are still throwing money at programs that dont move the needle.
After almost twenty years running training programs throughout Australia, the gap between perceived needs and effective solutions continues expanding. Just last quarter, I observed three Melbourne companies waste a total of one hundred eighty thousand on executive retreats when their supervisors struggled with basic meeting coordination.
Here's the uncomfortable reality : development programs fail because they address surface issues rather than root problems.
Take communication skills training. Everyone loves booking these sessions because they sound vital and tick all the HR boxes. Yet when I examine the situation more closely, the genuine issue isnt poor communication skills. The issue is organisational environments that discourage truthful dialogue, where highlighting problems means being seen as troublesome, or where knowledge is strategically hoarded to maintain power.
Training cannot solve systemic organisational issues.
I learned this the hard way working with a financial services company in Sydney about five years back. Client feedback scores were collapsing, so inevitably, they arranged customer care development for the whole front line workforce. Following six weeks and $45,000 expenditure, scores showed no improvement. The real issue was the problem was not training it was that their system took three separate logins and four different screens just to access basic customer information. Staff were spending more time wrestling with technology than helping customers.
Resolved the system issues. Scores jumped by 40% in less than a month.
Now, this might upset conventional thinkers: I genuinely support systematic professional development. When it's done right, training can enhance performance, build confidence, and create genuine capability improvements. The critical element is grasping what "correctly implemented" genuinely entails.
Genuine professional development commences with acknowledging your actual circumstances, not your hoped-for results. Many initiatives commence with executive aspirations for the business, instead of candidly examining present conditions.
I recall consulting with an Adelaide manufacturing firm that sought to introduce "adaptive management methodologies" across their entire operation. Seemed forward thinking. The issue was their existing culture relied on strict hierarchies, comprehensive processes, and directive management that had succeeded for years. Trying to overlay agile methodologies on that foundation was like trying to install a solar panel system on a house with faulty wiring.
We spent three months solely documenting their current decision making workflows before addressing any development material. When everyone comprehended how operations truly ran versus documented workflows, we could build development that closed those disconnects effectively.
The best professional development I have seen focuses on building systems thinking, not just individual skills.
Commonwealth Bank manages this remarkably successfully throughout their retail network. Rather than simply educating individual staff on service methods, they develop people to grasp the complete customer experience, recognise constraints, and suggest enhancements. Their supervisors arent simply managing staff they are constantly enhancing workflows.
This creates a completely different mindset. Instead of "how do I improve my performance," it evolves into "how do we enhance the complete system." That shift changes everything.
Naturally, there's still heaps of awful training taking place. Standard management courses that use examples from US companies to educate Australian leaders. Dialogue training that concentrates on personality frameworks instead of workplace interactions. Team development activities that overlook the reality that groups have basic resource or objective conflicts.
The worst offenders are the motivational speaker circuit programs. You understand them pricey half day seminars with speakers who maintain they have found the "ten keys" of something. Participants depart feeling motivated for roughly a week, then return to identical problems with identical limitations.
Real development happens when you give people the tools to understand and impact their work environment, not just cope with it better.
Technical skills are crucial too, clearly. Technical education, project leadership, financial knowledge - these produce measurable capability improvements that people can use immediately. Yet even these operate more successfully when tied to actual business issues rather than academic examples.
I partnered with a retail group last year where store supervisors needed enhanced inventory control skills. Rather than classroom education about stock rotation concepts, we engaged managers with genuine inventory issues in their own locations, with mentors offering immediate support. They absorbed information quicker, remembered more, and applied changes instantly because they were addressing their real issues.
The timing component gets neglected regularly. Training someone on performance management techniques six months after they become a supervisor means they've already developed habits and approaches that need to be unlearned. Far better to deliver that development as part of the advancement process, not as a subsequent consideration.
Smaller companies actually hold advantages here that large organisations regularly miss. They can be more flexible, more focused, and more hands on in their development approach. No necessity for detailed systems or organisation approved courses. Simply focus on what people require to perform their roles more effectively and provide them chances to practice with assistance.
Telstras approach to technical training is worth noting. They merge organised learning with mentoring partnerships and project work that requires people to use new skills immediately. The knowledge persists because its instantly applicable and constantly reinforced.
But the elephant in the room that nobody wants to acknowledge : sometimes the problem isnt lack of skills or knowledge. Sometimes people know exactly what needs to be done but cannot do it because of organisational constraints, resource limitations, or conflicting priorities.
No volume of training addresses that. You have to resolve the organisational issues first, then develop people within that better framework.
The ROI issue surfaces regularly with professional development. Valid concern training demands money and time. But evaluating effectiveness requires looking at business outcomes, not just training metrics. Did customer satisfaction enhance? Are projects being executed more efficiently? Have safety incidents decreased? Are people staying longer and functioning better?
Most training evaluations focus on whether people enjoyed the session and whether they feel more confident. Those measurements are basically worthless for establishing business effect.
Here's something contentious : not everyone requires professional development simultaneously or identically. Some people need technical skills, others need leadership development, still others need help understanding business fundamentals. Generic approaches waste resources and irritate participants.
The future of professional development is presumably more individualised, more practical, and more aligned with actual work. Reduced classroom time, increased coaching and mentoring. Less generic programs, more tailored solutions. Less focus on what people should know, more emphasis on what they can actually do differently.
Thats not automatically cheaper or simpler, but its more successful. And effectiveness should be the only metric that matters when you are investing in peoples growth.
Website: https://the-management-training.mystrikingly.com/
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant