@ronnymouton
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 3 weeks ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
End Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Company Has Zero Understanding What Really Matters: How Time Organization Training Doesn't Work in Dysfunctional Workplaces
I'll going to demolish one of the biggest widespread myths in workplace training: the assumption that showing employees more effective "task management" methods will fix time management challenges in organizations that have zero coherent priorities themselves.
With seventeen years of consulting with organizations on productivity issues, I can tell you that time management training in a poorly-run organization is like instructing someone to arrange their items while their home is actively collapsing around them.
Let me share the fundamental problem: most companies dealing with from productivity crises do not have efficiency issues - they have management failures.
Conventional task planning training assumes that workplaces have well-defined, unchanging objectives that workers can learn to recognize and focus on. This idea is completely divorced from the real world in most current organizations.
We consulted with a significant advertising company where workers were constantly expressing frustration about being "unable to prioritize their tasks properly." Leadership had invested massive sums on priority organization training for every employees.
Their training covered all the usual techniques: urgency-importance systems, task categorization methods, calendar organization methods, and detailed project organization software.
However performance remained to drop, employee stress rates rose, and client completion schedules turned longer, not improved.
Once I investigated what was really happening, I found the real problem: the organization as a whole had absolutely no clear priorities.
This is what the typical situation looked like for workers:
Monday: Top management would communicate that Initiative A was the "top objective" and all staff should to work on it right away
The next day: A different senior executive would announce an "critical" message insisting that Client B was really the "most important" focus
Day three: A third department head would schedule an "immediate" session to declare that Initiative C was a "critical" deliverable that had to be finished by Friday
Thursday: The first executive manager would express anger that Client A hadn't progressed as expected and require to know why staff were not "prioritizing" it as instructed
End of week: Every three clients would be delayed, several commitments would be missed, and employees would be held responsible for "ineffective priority planning skills"
This pattern was occurring continuously after week, systematically after month. Zero degree of "priority organization" training was able to enable employees navigate this systemic dysfunction.
The fundamental issue wasn't that employees did not understand how to organize - it was that the company at every level was entirely incapable of maintaining consistent direction for more than 72 hours at a time.
We helped leadership to eliminate their focus on "individual time planning" training and alternatively implement what I call "Strategic Priority Management."
Instead of attempting to show staff to organize within a constantly changing environment, we concentrated on building actual company direction:
Implemented a single executive decision-making team with clear authority for determining and preserving strategic direction
Established a formal initiative review procedure that happened monthly rather than constantly
Developed clear guidelines for when priorities could be modified and what degree of authorization was required for such modifications
Implemented mandatory notification systems to ensure that any project modifications were shared systematically and consistently across all levels
Implemented stability periods where absolutely no priority disruptions were permitted without emergency justification
Their change was instant and outstanding:
Staff overwhelm instances decreased dramatically as staff for the first time understood what they were supposed to be concentrating on
Output improved by nearly 50% within 45 days as employees could actually focus on finishing projects rather than repeatedly switching between conflicting demands
Work quality results got better substantially as teams could coordinate and execute projects without continuous interruptions and modifications
Client relationships increased significantly as projects were actually delivered on time and to standards
This reality: before you show employees to manage tasks, ensure your company really has clear direction that are deserving of working toward.
Here's another approach that priority planning training fails in poorly-run organizations: by assuming that workers have real authority over their work and tasks.
We worked with a government organization where workers were constantly being criticized for "inadequate time management" and sent to "efficiency" training workshops.
The reality was that these staff had essentially zero influence over their work schedules. Let me describe what their typical schedule looked like:
Approximately the majority of their time was taken up by required conferences that they couldn't avoid, irrespective of whether these conferences were relevant to their real work
A further significant portion of their time was dedicated to completing required reports and administrative requirements that added no usefulness to their primary responsibilities or to the clients they were intended to serve
Their final 20% of their schedule was expected to be used for their actual job - the activities they were paid to do and that really mattered to the agency
Additionally even this limited portion of time was constantly invaded by "urgent" requirements, unexpected conferences, and management demands that had no option to be delayed
Given these conditions, zero degree of "priority planning" training was able to help these workers become more effective. Their challenge wasn't their employee priority management skills - it was an systemic structure that made efficient work virtually unattainable.
I helped them establish organizational improvements to address the underlying barriers to efficiency:
Eliminated pointless conferences and created strict requirements for when gatherings were really justified
Simplified administrative requirements and removed unnecessary form-filling processes
Created dedicated periods for actual professional activities that couldn't be disrupted by meetings
Established clear protocols for evaluating what qualified as a genuine "urgent situation" versus normal tasks that could wait for designated times
Implemented delegation processes to ensure that responsibilities was distributed equitably and that no employee was overburdened with unsustainable demands
Worker efficiency rose dramatically, professional happiness improved notably, and their department finally commenced delivering better outcomes to the public they were intended to support.
This crucial insight: you cannot solve productivity issues by training people to work more successfully within dysfunctional structures. Companies need to repair the systems initially.
At this point let's examine probably the biggest absurd component of time organization training in poorly-run organizations: the idea that staff can mysteriously prioritize tasks when the company as a whole changes its direction several times per week.
The team consulted with a software company where the founder was famous for experiencing "innovative" revelations numerous times per period and demanding the entire company to immediately pivot to accommodate each new idea.
Employees would show up at their jobs on any given day with a clear understanding of their objectives for the week, only to discover that the CEO had decided overnight that all priorities they had been focusing on was not relevant and that they should to instantly start concentrating on something entirely new.
That pattern would occur multiple times per period. Work that had been stated as "critical" would be abandoned halfway through, groups would be constantly re-assigned to alternative initiatives, and massive quantities of resources and work would be wasted on projects that were not delivered.
The startup had poured extensively in "flexible work management" training and advanced priority management systems to assist staff "adapt efficiently" to shifting priorities.
Yet zero amount of training or software could overcome the fundamental issue: people cannot successfully prioritize constantly evolving directions. Perpetual shifting is the antithesis of successful organization.
The team assisted them implement what I call "Strategic Objective Stability":
Established scheduled planning assessment sessions where significant strategy changes could be discussed and implemented
Created firm requirements for what represented a genuine justification for changing established objectives outside the planned assessment cycles
Created a "priority consistency" period where no adjustments to current priorities were allowed without emergency approval
Established defined communication protocols for when objective adjustments were absolutely essential, including complete cost evaluations of what projects would be interrupted
Mandated documented approval from several stakeholders before any substantial strategy modifications could be approved
Their change was dramatic. Within three months, real project completion percentages improved by over dramatically. Staff burnout rates dropped significantly as staff could at last work on completing work rather than constantly beginning new ones.
Creativity surprisingly got better because groups had enough resources to thoroughly explore and test their ideas rather than continuously switching to new projects before any work could be fully developed.
That lesson: good prioritization requires priorities that remain consistent long enough for teams to genuinely work on them and complete significant progress.
This is what I've learned after decades in this industry: priority management training is only useful in workplaces that genuinely have their strategic priorities functioning.
If your organization has stable business direction, achievable expectations, competent leadership, and systems that support rather than prevent effective work, then task organization training can be helpful.
Yet if your workplace is characterized by constant dysfunction, competing directions, poor organization, excessive demands, and reactive leadership approaches, then priority organization training is more harmful than pointless - it's directly damaging because it holds responsible personal choices for leadership dysfunction.
End wasting time on time planning training until you've resolved your leadership priorities initially.
Start creating companies with stable organizational focus, effective management, and processes that really enable productive accomplishment.
Company employees will manage tasks just effectively once you offer them direction deserving of working toward and an environment that actually facilitates them in doing their jobs. carrying excessive load with impossible workloads
Worker efficiency improved significantly, professional happiness improved considerably, and this agency genuinely started offering better services to the public they were meant to serve.
That key point: companies cannot address time management problems by training people to work more effectively productively within broken systems. Companies must repair the organizations initially.
Currently let's discuss perhaps the greatest ridiculous aspect of priority planning training in chaotic workplaces: the belief that staff can somehow organize tasks when the management at leadership level changes its priorities multiple times per month.
I consulted with a IT business where the executive leadership was notorious for going through "brilliant" revelations several times per week and expecting the complete organization to immediately pivot to implement each new direction.
Staff would come at the office on regularly with a specific understanding of their objectives for the week, only to find that the leadership had decided over the weekend that all priorities they had been concentrating on was not a priority and that they needed to right away begin working on an initiative totally different.
That cycle would occur multiple times per week. Work that had been stated as "critical" would be forgotten before completion, departments would be repeatedly re-assigned to new projects, and significant portions of resources and energy would be wasted on initiatives that were ultimately not delivered.
Their startup had poured extensively in "adaptive work organization" training and sophisticated project tracking software to help staff "adapt rapidly" to evolving requirements.
However no level of training or systems could overcome the fundamental problem: people cannot efficiently organize perpetually shifting objectives. Constant change is the enemy of successful planning.
We helped them create what I call "Focused Priority Stability":
Created scheduled planning planning cycles where significant priority modifications could be considered and adopted
Developed strict requirements for what qualified as a legitimate justification for changing agreed-upon objectives outside the regular review periods
Created a "priority stability" time where no adjustments to current directions were permitted without extraordinary circumstances
Established clear coordination systems for when priority adjustments were absolutely necessary, including complete cost analyses of what initiatives would be abandoned
Established documented authorization from multiple decision-makers before each major direction modifications could be approved
Their change was remarkable. After three months, actual project completion percentages rose by more than three times. Employee burnout rates fell significantly as people could finally focus on delivering work rather than constantly beginning new ones.
Creativity surprisingly improved because teams had adequate time to fully explore and refine their concepts rather than repeatedly changing to new initiatives before anything could be fully developed.
The reality: successful organization requires objectives that keep stable long enough for people to actually focus on them and achieve significant progress.
This is what I've discovered after decades in this industry: task organization training is exclusively useful in organizations that genuinely have their strategic priorities together.
Once your workplace has stable business objectives, realistic expectations, effective management, and structures that enable rather than prevent effective activity, then priority planning training can be beneficial.
However if your organization is characterized by continuous crisis management, competing directions, poor organization, unrealistic workloads, and reactive leadership styles, then priority organization training is more harmful than ineffective - it's directly destructive because it blames individual performance for organizational incompetence.
Stop throwing away time on priority management training until you've fixed your leadership direction initially.
Focus on building workplaces with clear strategic direction, competent decision-making, and systems that really facilitate efficient accomplishment.
Company staff would organize just fine once you offer them something worth prioritizing and an environment that really enables them in accomplishing their responsibilities.
If you have any concerns about the place and how to use Team Training Melbourne, you can get in touch with us at the web site.
Website: https://etrainingcompany.bigcartel.com/skills-for-communication
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant